Thanks for viewing...

Thank you for coming to visit my new blog. I hope you find it useful in taking Direct Action in your life and our world. Also let's become a community: https://www.edmodo.com/sunnydawnshiner

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Feinstein, Boxer tell PTA to stop attacks on Brown Wyatt Buchanan Updated 10:22 a.m., Friday, August 17, 2012


Feinstein, Boxer tell PTA to stop attacks on Brown

Updated 10:22 a.m., Friday, August 17, 2012
Sacramento --
Top Democratic elected leaders in California are urging proponents of a ballot measure that rivals Gov. Jerry Brown's tax-raising Proposition 30 not to directly attack or refer to the governor's measure in their campaign.
In a letter sent Thursday to Carol Kocivar, the president of the California State PTA, U.S. Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer - along with the top two Democrats in the Legislature - called for a "positive campaign compact" between the rival campaigns.
The PTA is the leading proponent of Proposition 38, which would raise the income tax on a large number of Californians for 13 years and direct most of that money to public schools. Higher income earners would pay the most.
The initiative is bankrolled almost entirely by wealthy civil rights attorney Molly Munger, but the PTA is the public face of the campaign.
The Democrats said the campaign for Prop. 38 is becoming "increasingly negative" and said Munger has engaged in "personal attacks" against Brown and his measure, Prop. 30.
They wrote that Munger has referred to Brown as "untruthful," has called his proposition a "shell game" and "a tiny Band-Aid," and has said it would be "terrible for kids."
In the letter to Kocivar, the Democrats wrote, "As the leading supporter of Prop. 38, the PTA is the only organization in a position to make (the compact) happen. We are hopeful you feel a responsibility to prevent a negative campaign that will ultimately damage our schools."
The governor's campaign team immediately agreed to the compact and released the letter to the media.
Kocivar said she would respond in writing to the senators, along with Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and Assembly Speaker John Pérez, who also signed it.
"Responding directly to them instead of through the press is the best way to do it at this point," Kocivar said.
While she didn't respond to the allegations of a negative campaign, Prop. 38 spokesman Nathan Ballard said, "Prop 38 will improve California's public schools more than any other measure on the ballot, and we will not hesitate to point out that fact in a civil, respectful manner."
The leaders in the Legislature have been strong proponents of the governor's plan and had called on Munger to drop her efforts months ago. This written plea comes just one day after Brown formally kicked off the campaign for his ballot measure at a high school in Sacramento.
A spokesman for Prop. 38 responded to that event by noting that the school would receive more money under Prop. 38 than through the governor's proposal. The governor's political advisers have said they worry that a contentious campaign could lead to the defeat of both measures.
Speaking to reporters in San Jose on Thursday, Brown called the proposed compact "excellent." The governor then made an indirect reference to the competing initiative, telling reporters, "When it comes to the election, in terms of the schools, there is only one measure that can stop the $5.5 billion tax cut to schools and half a billion to colleges, and that's (Prop.) 30."
Those trigger cuts were included by the governor and Legislature in the state budget and are set to take place this winter if voters reject the governor's measure - even if Prop. 38 passes.
That's because revenue from Prop. 38 wouldn't begin flowing to schools until 2013, generating between $6 billion and $6.5 billion per year for schools, according to the Legislative Analyst's Office.
Even as Democrats attempt to stop the attacks on Prop. 30 from the left, conservative antitax groups are hitting it from the right and a committee opposing the measure already has formed.
Aaron McLear, a spokesman for the effort to defeat Prop. 30, said the letter from the Democrats shows that the claims made about the positive aspects of Prop. 30 can't withstand harsh scrutiny.
"It looks like the myths of Prop. 30 are beginning to crumble and the campaign is responding with a desperate gimmick," he said.
Wyatt Buchanan is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail:


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Feinstein-Boxer-tell-PTA-to-stop-attacks-on-Brown-3794681.php#ixzz24ELEkywd

Bungling Billionaires Exposed: 11 a.m. — Tuesday, August 21 Where: St. Francis Yacht Club 99 Yacht Rd., San Francisco


‘Save Our State from the Bungling Billionaires’
Nurses, Teachers, Scour Yacht Club Tuesday to Expose Secret Wealthy Donors to Anti-Prop. 30 Campaign

SAN FRANCISCO-California nurses, teachers, and responsible business individuals will pay a visit to the posh St. Francis Yacht Club on the aptly named Yacht Road in San Francisco Tuesday in what promises to be a colorful event to shine a spotlight on the secretive wealthy donors who are bankrolling the campaign to defeat Proposition 30.

The Tuesday action will include a yacht, SOS life rings, and actors playing the role of the  four mega-rich venture capitalists who recently formed a committee deceptively named “Californians for Reforms and Jobs Not Taxes Campaign” to defeat Proposition 30 on the November ballot.

Committee members include Floyd Kvamme, GOP donor and part of a committee fined by the Federal Elections Committee after the 2004 election; David Marquardt and Mark Stevens, venture capitalist donors to Mitt Romney and George W. Bush; and John Cox, fringe candidate for president in 2008, whose PAC has taken money from Phillip Morris.

What:         Bungling Billionaires Exposed:
When:                    11 a.m. — Tuesday, August 21
Where:                  St. Francis Yacht Club
                           99 Yacht Rd., San Francisco

“These amateur multimillionaires are playing with our state's future like they play with their yachts and other toys,” said Malinda Markowitz, RN, and a co-president of the California Nurses Association/National Nurses United. “Why are they funneling hordes of cash against a campaign to protect our schools, our healthcare safety net, and other vital California services simply to avoid paying a little more of their fair share?”

"For me, an extra 2 percent or 3 percent in taxes is not going to make a bit of difference in the way that I live,” said Frank Jernigan, a retired Google software engineer and member of the Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength. “But by bringing billions of dollars in new revenues to California for public schools and safety, Prop. 30 will make a tremendous difference in the lives of many."

Today on Your Call: What can we do to support teachers? (radio show)


Today on Your Call: What can we do to support teachers?


8/20/12 Morning Show!

Able to get a quick sound byte in!  Interesting PTA called right after and Radio Host didn't even know there are 2 measures competing against each other.


Sunday, August 19, 2012

Prop 30, The Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act


aftlogo California Federation of Teachers, AFT/AFL-CIO

Talking Points / Prop 30, The Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act

Core messages
• Everyone needs to pay their fair share to fund California’s future, including the wealthy
• This measure will raise $9 billion in the first year and $6 billion/year for public education and local public safety
• It is a progressive tax measure, with 90% of the revenues coming from people who make at least $250,000/year
• It will prevent trigger cuts from further devastating our schools, higher education, and vital services

Who it taxes:  Personal income in excess of $250,000/year
Prop 30 will impose a 1 to 3% additional tax on personal income in excess of $250,000, $300,000, and $500,000 per year, and joint filers at $500,000, $600,000, and one million dollars. The income tax portion of Prop 30 will only tax people who make more than a quarter million dollars per year.  The sales tax portion of the measure is a modest ¼ cent increase, or one cent on a $4 hamburger.  9 of 10 dollars generated will be from the wealthy.

Why we need Prop 30:  to restore education, public services
$20 billion in public education funding reductions over the past three years have resulted in
·       layoffs and furloughs of thousands of school employees, and social service and public safety workers
·       the school year has been shortened in many districts, and class sizes have increased by as much as 35%
·       college and university students have lost classes, and student costs have skyrocketed along with time needed to graduate; student debt now exceeds all credit card debt.
·       Cuts to public safety, health and human services, taken from the sick, the elderly, disabled and the hungry.
·       Without passage of this measure, “trigger cuts” would eliminate additional billions of dollars in programs and jobs.

Prop 30 will rehire laid off teachers to reduce K-12 class sizes and restore lost college courses, and restore cuts to local public safety agencies. 

A progressive tax proposal
With Prop 30 no one but the wealthy would pay more in income taxes.  The top one percent of income earners has doubled its share of total state income over the past twenty years, while income for the rest of us has stagnated or gone backwards.  The top one percent currently takes in nearly one quarter of total state income; twenty years ago it was just one eighth.  At the same time, the top tax brackets (state and federal) today are lower than they used to be.  Between 1991 and 1996 the highest tax bracket in California was 11% of income; today it is 10.3%.  When Congress extended the Bush federal tax cuts for the rich in 2010, the top 1% in California received a windfall totaling nine to fourteen billion dollars per year.  This is nearly equal to the entire state budget deficit.

California is the richest state in the richest country on earth.  California is not “broke.”  Rather, the problems are that the tax system is broken, and the state’s money is increasingly in the wrong pockets.  Most of us are already paying our fair share of taxes.  It’s time everyone did, including the wealthy. As former Google software engineer Frank Jernigan said, “For me, an extra 2% or 3% in taxes is not going to make a bit of difference in the way that I live.  But by bringing billions of dollars in new revenues to California for public schools and safety, Prop 30 will make a tremendous difference in the lives of many.” This measure will increase the progressivity of the state income tax code by extending the 10.3% bracket down to $250,000, and adding brackets at $300,000 (11.3%), $500,000 (12.3%), and joint filers at $1 million (13.3%).

Opinion research shows Prop 30 is the most likely tax measure to pass
Numerous public opinion polls show that the electorate understands the growing economic inequality in California and the country, and believes that 99% of us are already paying our fair share of taxes, while the 1% richest does not, but should.  Polling numbers for Prop 30 are strong.  Emphasizing the strongly progressive nature of the income tax portion Act, while acknowledging the smaller regressive sales tax component, helps people to positively assess the impact of the Act.  Prop 30 is the best policy to restore public services and reduce economic inequality, and the idea that the public likes the most. 

Thursday, August 16, 2012

San Francisco, California: Will you Stand Up for Public Schools? (www.uesf.org)


Will you Stand Up for Public Schools?
Prop 30, the Protect Schools and Local Public Safety Act, will protect us from further drastic cuts in school funding (up to 16.5 furlough days in the SFUSD over the next 2 years!).
Prop 32, the Special Exemptions Act, will effectively silence our voices by preventing UESF and all other unions from collecting the voluntary dues-dollars it takes to support initiatives like Prop 30. In San Francisco, we also have the opportunity to elect a new School Board that respects our professional rights and is committed to fully supporting the work that we do.

·      Prop 30, the Protect Schools and Local Public Safety Act, a MUST for public schools!
·      Prop 32, The Special Exemptions Act is NOT what it seems!
·      Elect Haney, Popek, Rodriguez, and Walton – The UESF-endorsed slate for School Board!

Get involved, learn more, and share what you know with coworkers, friends and families.  We must PASS the Protect Schools and Local Public Safety Act (Prop. 30), STOP the Special Exemptions Act (Prop. 32), and ELECT a new school board that respects the work we do and is accountable to our students.

Join your colleagues today!
Pass the Protect Schools and Local Public Safety Act, Stop the Special Exemptions Act and Elect a New School Board!

Name:


Voting Address:
(No PO Boxes)

Cell #:


Worksite Location:


Non-School Email:


o   I will vote YES on Prop 30, the Protect Schools and Local Public Safety Act

o   I will vote NO on Prop 32, to stop the Special Exemptions Act!

o   Yes, I am willing to talk with my UESF colleagues, local community group, neighbors, family and friends about these initiatives!

o   Tell me more about the new School Board team of candidates and why we must defeat the incumbents.

o   Please sign me up for text message alerts! (Standard text rates apply - text the word STOP to unsubscribe)

£ Yes, I am on Facebook!             £  Yes, I am on Twitter!
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY