Thanks for viewing...
Thank you for coming to visit my new blog. I hope you find it useful in taking Direct Action in your life and our world. Also let's become a community: https://www.edmodo.com/sunnydawnshiner
Labels
- Administration Approaches (27)
- Common Core (27)
- Conscious Parenting (2)
- Environment (16)
- Graduate Student Issues (7)
- Hip Hop Pedagogy (13)
- Ms. Dawn's Class (9)
- National Board Notes (44)
- Politics (75)
- Positive Teaching Practice (58)
- Science (13)
- Teacher Leader (20)
- Union Notes (71)
Total Pageviews
Friday, April 20, 2012
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
*Special Written Assignment on School Mandates
It Is Hard to See How Mandates Are Supporting
Us
By Sunny Dawn, Cleveland Elem., San Francisco,
CA.
My
K-5 elementary school is on the East Side of San Francisco where we experience
a population of students who are disenfranchised and have huge disparities in
relation to the West Side of the same city. This paper will give a brief overview of how district
mandated quarterly assessments are not serving the students at my elementary
school’s in San Francisco or serving as proper tools for teachers to gain an
understanding of students’ educational needs especially in schools such as mine
who have students “of color” or bilingual schools. Furthermore it will present the idea that current
administration is also unaware how to serve the needs of the teachers in
creating tools for proper instruction.
My class
is a good representation of the half the school’s population, which is 80% of low socioeconomic background English
language learners. The range of
ethnicities include; Chinese, Filipino, African American as well various type
of Latino students from Central American to Mexican. There are over 5 different home languages represented in my
class and half of my class travels regularly out of the country to visit a
majority of their extended families.
The other half of the school is the bilingual strand, which experience a
wide range of issues from immigration, to high poverty, as well as various
health issues.
Although we have dedicated
teachers who are committed to social justice in education it is hard to see how
the current district administration is supporting us. We are given release time once a week to talk with our grade
level about educational strategies but, instead of teachers being able to lead
the discussions a majority of meetings are led by a district appointed “Instructional
Reform Facilitator” or (IRF). This IRF then reports back to the principal and
district administrations about the “discussion” which is always results or application of the quarterly
district mandated assessment (or CLAs).
I recently went to a Union meeting
discussion about district mandated assessments in October of 2011. At this meeting over 20 elementary
teachers from a wide variety of schools were present and furious about how the
district mandated assessments are developmentally inappropriate for K thru 2nd
and in 3rd thru 5th grades material is often unaccessable for many
students especially English Language Learners. When the Head of Achievement Assessments, John Burke, was asked at that October meeting, how
are these assessments were helpful to teachers his reply was,”well hopefully we
will be able to make the tests align to the curriculum especially with math
this year,” A follow up question to this district official was asked by another
elementary teacher, “If these assessments are not aligned with the standards,
if it is wasting the student’s time because it’s not testing them on what they
are supposed to have learned then why can’t we halt that until it is
perfected?” His response, “Right now, again we are trying to serve two purposes
with it. Some to inform instruction some for the benchmarking. So right now
that’s what we have. This year it’s much more of a compromise, last year
towards the benchmarking….The CLAs are mandated by Richard Caranza so the expectations
is that everyone…..”
Finally my staff was given anonymous
polls using the website, www.pollseverywhere.com , to find out their feelings
on district mandates. The first
question given was, “I feel like I have enough time to go over data from
mandated assessments and implement action in my classroom?” 87% of the 15 staff
who participated in the survey said, “NO” Also my staff participated in two
more surveys in which 57% of the staff (who participated) reported “we have too
many assessments”. The final
question given to staff, “The district mandated assessments my students take
are on material we have had a chance to cover in class prior to the date
required to give test?” 100% of the staff disagreed or strongly disagreed with
this statement (see attached graphs or go
to www.msdawnsturntospeak.blogspot.com to see poll results).
In conclusion, elementary teachers
educated and trained observations are that district mandated assessments do not
serve their classroom pedagogy and are actually damaging children instead.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
National Board Test Chat for EC/GEN.
://ecgen.org/2012/03/nbpts-assessment-center-season-almost-here/
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Now That You Fired The Teachers Enjoy Your Retirement
March
25, 2012
Congratulations Carlos Garcia, now that you
participated in laying one fourth of all teachers who received lay off notices
in California, I hope you enjoy your retirement. As reported in S.F. gate, March 15, 2012 Carranza is “hoping to agree on a contract within the next couple of weeks” Wouldn’t it be nice if teachers
could rely or agree on their contract too? You know that little thing that’s been battered and bruised
overtime with Furlough days and Pay Freezes.
But I just
want to refresh your memory before you started making July vacation plans with your SFUSD money. There were over
40 teachers begging you to reconsider your position on Zone schools, including
my nine-year old daughter, in regards to laying off teachers last March 13,
2012 at the San Francisco Board Meeting.
We asked you to listen to workers’ rights or to what Dennis Kelly, UESF
President, has said to you at previous Board of Education Meetings, “Social
Justice for some is Social Justice for none.” However you went against that and now here we are teachers
fighting each other over who deserves to keep their job.
I am at
teacher Cleveland Elementary, which is experiencing teacher lay offs. We are not part of a “Zone School” even
though we have the same populations and statistics. We are classified as a “Hard to Staff School”, have had a
large amount of money poured into our school from SFUSD for English Development
Trainings, as well as half our staff are participating in National Board
Certification yet does any of this matter,No.
Why should
it? Your contract is up and its retirement party time! Nevermind other teachers’ contracts are
up and its Unemployment Line Time for them. Either way congratulations on being done with SFUSD and
having nine-years olds shame you in public.
Sunny Dawn
Union
Representative and 3rd Grade Teacher for Cleveland Elementary
(emailed to Carlos Garcia, SF GATE Op ED, and SF Examiner OP ED today)
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Saturday, March 10, 2012
UESF AFT TEACHER LEADER GROUP S.F. Vision!
Concerns:
Teacher Leaders
· Enlisting other teachers taking it back to school
· Link to technology networking/community resources
· Group think
· Union
· Limited time. What can we really get accomplished.
· Meet with politicians
· What will the product be?
· We get a say to the district
· Press conference – feedback to media from TL
· Reaching out beyond SFUSD to other districts
· Is there an ultimate goal?
Teaching, Learning, Education
· Disparity urban/suburban
· Class warfare
· Lack of continuity – 5 years, 5 admins
· Corporations – schools as cash cow
· Charter schools
· Lack of training in cultural awareness. Institutional racism
· Schools should be community schools
· Criminalization of youth b/c lack of resources
· Disparity between schools within district
· School safety
· Data that we can trust
· Reducing teacher cynicism
· Crisis in leadership – admin, superintendent, district initiatives
- Arne Duncan
- Bill Gates
· Teacher education
· Testing
Vision: Group A
· Teacher voices will be heard and deemed legitimate by policy makers, media and administrators (from site to federallevel)
· Holistic approach to student assessment – reallocate funds to books and the arts
· Teacher driven PD
· Creation of TL website
Vision: Group B
· Create community schools – provide community services (medical, therapy, etc)
· Major realignment of priorities and resources
· There is a holistic relationship between the micro-level and macro-level with accountability to be one another (i.e. politicians communicate with teacher speaker bureaus)
· Redesign administrative positions to better serve students and teacher needs (i.e. teacher input into principal evaluations)
Visions: Group C
· Building communication across differences.
· Working together, reflecting as school staff, community including institutions in our society to create, implement solutions for our children
· Support a diverse school for staff for our children
· Support holistic educational environment which ensures the needs of our children and school staff
Barriers to Reaching Our Vision
· Historical barriers affecting achievement gap
· Corporate reformers controlling the terms of debate
· Lack of teacher support (resources, time, etc.)
· Convincing public of public education being in public’s best interest
· Literacy and poverty in students’ lives
· Cultural norms/white liberal
· Learning how to create culturally relevant curriculum/pedagogy
· Reason for high dropout rates for Latinos/Blacks
· District hierarchy
· Revolving/turnover of admins
· Need for students to deal with trauma and stress (restorative justice?)
· Administration? Overburdened?
· Lack of trust in system
· Lack of clear communication? Collaboration
Friday, March 9, 2012
UESF
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
